In this example, the maximal number of cosets defined equals the final number of cosets for most combinations. Thus, only the total number of cosets defined is of interest for most strategies. Strategy NONE reveals to be best with respect to all orderings for this example, the best combinations being NONE together with kbo-A and kbo-a. The number of totally defined cosets differs only slightly ranging from 667 to 684.
For the other strategies there is a greater variation and no distinct order which one performs best.